J.J
J.J., C.D., C.B., and D.F., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. ASHLYNN MARKETING GROUP, INC.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 J.J., C.D., C.B., and D.F., individually and Case No.: 3:24-cv-00311-GPC-MSB on behalf of all others similarly situated, 12
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S
Plaintiffs, 13 MOTION FOR v. RECONSIDERATION 14
ASHLYNN MARKETING GROUP,
15 [ECF No. 84]
INC.,
16 Defendant. 17
18 This case concerns Defendant’s alleged failure to warn consumers of the purportedly 19 addictive nature of kratom when marketing and labeling its kratom-based products. On 20 July 1, 2025, this Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part Defendant 21 Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.’s second motion to dismiss. ECF No. 77. Currently before 22 the Court is Defendant’s motion for reconsideration. ECF No. 84. The motion has been 23 fully briefed. ECF Nos. 90, 94. The matter was scheduled for a hearing on October 17, 24 2025. The Court vacates the hearing and, for the reasons discussed below, DENIES 25 Defendant’s motion for reconsideration. 26 / / / 27 1 …