Ramirez

Luisa Ramirez v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, a Washington corporation; and Does 1 through 20

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20253:24-cv-01197California2,044 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LUISA RAMIREZ, Case No.: 24-CV-1197 TWR (LR)

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

13 v. EX PARTE APPLICATIONS (1) TO

STRIKE “JOINT” STATEMENT OF

14 COSTCO WHOLESALE

UNDISPUTED FACTS, AND (2) FOR

CORPORATION, a Washington 15 LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY corporation; and DOES 1 through 20,

16 Defendants. (ECF Nos. 59-2, 60, 61) 17

18 Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Luisa Ramirez’s Ex Parte Applications to 19 Strike Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts Filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale 20 Corporation [ECF 59] (“Ex Parte App. to Strike,” ECF No. 60) and for Leave to File a Sur- 21 Reply to Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation’s Reply Memorandum in Support of 22 Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Ex Parte App. for Sur-Reply,” ECF No. 23 61). Defendant filed oppositions to each of Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Applications on October 8, 24 2025.1 (See ECF No. 62 (“Sur-Reply Opp’n”), 63 (“Strike…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.