Judice

Charles Anthony Judice v. United States Department of Veteran Affairs, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20253:25-cv-00887California784 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 Charles Anthony JUDICE, Case No.: 25-cv-0887-AGS-MSB 4 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO

DISMISS (ECF 11, 13) AND

5 v.

DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH

6 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LEAVE TO AMEND 7 VETERAN AFFAIRS, et al., 8 Defendants. 9 10 Plaintiff Charles Judice, acting without an attorney, has sued his ex-spouse James 11 Judice, the City of Chula Vista, and other defendants. (See generally ECF 8.) Defendants 12 James Judice and Chula Vista both move to dismiss, in large part because Charles Judice’s 13 119-page, often single-spaced amended complaint was so verbose and confusing that 14 defendants were unsure what claims are alleged against them. (See ECF 12-1, at 5; 15 ECF 13-1, at 8.) Both also move to dismiss the parts of the complaint that they can discern 16 due to Judice’s failure to state a claim. (See generally ECF 12-1; ECF 13-1.) 17 Despite an opportunity to oppose those motions, Judice never responded. So, he has 18 “waived” and “abandoned” his current…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.