Custillo

Collin Trent Stowers v. David Custillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20251:25-cv-00773California671 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 COLLIN TRENT STOWERS, No. 1:25-cv-00773-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW

CAUSE

13 v.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF

14 DAVID CUSTILLO, EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AMENDED

COMPLAINT

15 Defendant. (ECF Nos. 9, 10) 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On July 11, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff complaint, found no cognizable claims, and 20 granted Plaintiff the opportunity to amend the complaint. (ECF No. 8.) After Plaintiff failed to 21 file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the Court’s order, Plaintiff was ordered to 22 show cause why the action should not be dismissed. (ECF No. 9.) 23 On September 5, 2025, Plaintiff filed a response to the order to show cause. (ECF No. 24 10.) Plaintiff contends that he is receiving threats and disciplinary violations because he filed the 25 instant action and states he needs to be transferred…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.