Michelle Smith, for S.L.I. III v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20251:25-cv-00791California1,790 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHELLE SMITH, for S.L.I. III, Case No. 1:25-cv-00791-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ASSIGN CASE TO DISTRICT JUDGE

13 v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL DISMISS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

SECURITY. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

15 Defendant. FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE 16 17 18 Plaintiff Michelle Smith is proceeding pro se in this action challenging the denial of social 19 security benefits on behalf of her minor son S.L.I., III. (Doc. No. 1). For the reasons set forth 20 below, the undersigned recommends the District Court dismiss this action without prejudice for 21 Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action and/or comply with a court order. 22 BACKGROUND 23 Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a pro se Complaint on June 30, 2025. (Doc. No. 1). 24 Plaintiff simultaneously filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and a motion to “represent” 25 her son in this matter. (Doc. Nos.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.