Mullin

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 TYGHE JAMES MULLIN, Case No. 5:25-cv-02191-BLF Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 9 CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW, MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION CALIFORNIA, et al., 10 Defendants. [Re: ECF No. 60] 11

12 13 Plaintiff Tyghe James Mullin brought this pro se § 1983 action against Defendants City of 14 Mountain View and individual police officers in their official capacities. On September 24, 2025, 15 the Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s second amended complaint for failure 16 to state a claim. ECF No. 53. Plaintiff now moves for reconsideration or for certification of an 17 interlocutory appeal. ECF No. 60 (“Mot.”). 18 For the reasons described below, the motion is DENIED. 19 I. Background 20 The Second Amended Complaint asserts § 1983 claims for (1) unreasonable search and 21 seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment, (2) deprivation of due process in violation of the 22 Fourteenth Amendment,…