Brooke

Theresa Brooke v. 2612 Buck Owens Blvd. LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20251:25-cv-01138California992 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THERESA BROOKE, Case No. 1:25-cv-01138-JLT-CDB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE RE SUPPLEMENTAL

13 v. JURISDICTION 14 2612 BUCK OWENS BLVD. LLC, 7-DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendant. 16 17 On September 7, 2025, Plaintiff Theresa Brooke initiated this action against Defendant 2612 18 Buck Owens Blvd. LLC. (Doc. 1). The complaint asserts claims for injunctive relief under the 19 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”) and a claim for statutory damages under 20 California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”). Id. Plaintiff includes in her complaint a 21 conclusory assertion that “supplemental jurisdiction is appropriate over Plaintiff’s Unruh claim” as 22 “there are no compelling reasons to decline jurisdiction.” Id. at 2. 23 Based upon the Court of Appeals’ opinion in Vo v. Choi, this Court will order Plaintiff to 24 show cause why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.