Darch

Darch v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 17, 202524-5892California1,124 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 17 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RACHEL DARCH, No. 24-5892 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:24-cv-05192-SKV v.

MEMORANDUM*

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Sarah Kate Vaughan, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 15, 2025 ** Seattle, Washington

Before: W. FLETCHER and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges, and ORRICK, District Judge.***

Rachel Darch appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the Social

Security Commissioner’s denial of her application for Disabled Adult Child

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable William Horsley Orrick, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.