People v. Brown CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 17, 2025C102343California1,177 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mauro, J.

Filed 10/17/25 P. v. Brown CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Lassen) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C102343

v. (Super. Ct. No. 2024-

CR0090337)

TRAVELL BROWN,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Travell Brown asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Our review of the record discloses that the trial court did not orally pronounce a $300 parole revocation fine matching the $300 restitution fine

1 as required by law. (Pen. Code, § 1202.45, subd. (a).)1 We will modify the judgment to impose the $300 parole revocation fine. Finding no arguable error that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.