Barrie

Barrie v. Sacramento Municipal Utility District CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 17, 2025C098112California12,312 words

Opinion

Opinion

Duarte, J.

Filed 10/17/25 Barrie v. Sacramento Municipal Utility District CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

AMADU BARRIE, C098112

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2019- 00270682-CU-OE-GDS) v.

SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT

et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

This is an employment case involving claims for discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.)1 and California’s whistleblower statute (Lab. Code, § 1102.5). Plaintiff Amadu Barrie appeals from the judgment entered after the trial

1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Government Code.

1 court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.