S.C.

S.C. v. Doe 1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 17, 2025F088296California7,509 words

Opinion

Opinion

Detjen, J.

BACKGROUND

On September 14, 2022, S.C. initiated an action under former section 340.1, alleging the negligent acts and/or omissions of Doe 1 and/or Doe 1’s employee proximately caused childhood sexual assault that resulted in her injuries. The complaint specified S.C. “was in foster care under [Doe 1’s] custody, care, and control”; “[i]n approximately 1981 when [S.C.] was approximately thirteen (13) years old, [she] was sexually abused and assaulted by . . . her Foster Father, in whose home she was placed by [Doe 1]”; and “[d]uring the ongoing course of the aforementioned sexual abuse and assault by perpetrator, [S.C.] disclosed the same to a social worker,” but “no action was taken, no investigation was completed, and perpetrator continued to sexually abuse and assault [her]” (some capitalization omitted). On November 9, 2022, S.C. filed an “Ex Parte Application” (italics & some capitalization omitted) asking the superior court to (1) “review and approve the Certificates of Merit executed by [S.C.]’s counsel and a mental health practitioner of [S.C.]’s choosing” and “permit service on [Doe 1] in this action”; (2) “seal the Certificates of Merit in support of [S.C.]’s Complaint”;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.