Shaun Dupree Dean, Jr. v. Sacramento County, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20252:25-cv-00160California505 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHAUN DUPREE DEAN, JR., No. 2:25-cv-0160 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 18 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 19 636(b)(1). 20 The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 21 governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The 22 court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally 23 “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek 24 monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1),(2). 25 Plaintiff’s amended complaint is before the court for screening. 26 Plaintiff seeks damages against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.