Stavrinides

Elias Anthony Stavrinides v. Patrick Broderick, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20253:25-cv-04926California3,433 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ELIAS ANTHONY STAVRINIDES, Case No. 25-cv-04926-WHO

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER ON THE MOTIONS TO

9 v. DISMISS AND MOTION TO DECLARE

PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT

10 PATRICK BRODERICK, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 5, 8, 11, 15, 39 Defendants. 11

12 Before me are four motions filed by the several defendants in this case: three motions to 13 dismiss and one motion to declare pro se plaintiff Elias Stavrinides a vexatious litigant.1 The 14 motions to dismiss assert that the complaint is deficient pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil 15 Procedure 8, 12(b)(1), and 12(b)(6). I agree. Defendants Diana Gomez, Michael King, Tyler 16 Harrington, Todd Hoffman, Tennis Wick, Jesse Cablk, David Rabbitt, James Gore, and Lynda 17 Hopkins (the “County Defendants”) additionally move to declare Mr. Stavrinides a vexatious 18 litigant based on his prolific filings in other courts. Because Mr. Stavrinides has only appeared in 19 this court as of the filing of the instant case, I decline to grant their motion at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.