Tu

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CONNIE TU, Case No.: 24-cv-1221-WQH-MSB

Plaintiff, 12 ORDER v. 13 14 EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 HAYES, Judge: 17 On August 15, 2024, Defendant Trans Union LLC (“Trans Union”) filed its Answer 18 in this case. (ECF No. 9.) 19 On August 29, 2025, Defendant Trans Union filed a Motion for Leave to File a First 20 Amended Answer and Defenses to Plaintiff’s Complaint. (ECF No. 70.) 21 On September 5, 2025, the Court ordered that any opposition to the motion be filed 22 no later than September 22, 2025. (ECF No. 72.) The docket reflects that Plaintiff Tu has 23 not filed an opposition to the motion. 24 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 states that “[t]he court should freely give leave 25 [to amend] when justice so requires.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). “This policy is to be applied 26 with extreme liberality.” Eminence Cap., LLC v. Aspeon, Inc., 316 F.3d 1048, 1051 (9th 27 Cir. 2003) (per curiam) (quotation omitted). 28 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the …