Royall

Gabriel Adam Royall v. The Sherwin-Williams Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20253:25-cv-02577California1,629 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GABRIEL ADAM ROYALL, Case No.: 3:25-cv-2577-RSH-DEB

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

13 v. DISMISS

14 THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS [ECF No. 4]

COMPANY,

15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Pending before the Court is a motion to dismiss filed by defendant The Sherwin- 19 Williams Co. (“Sherwin-Williams” or “Defendant”). ECF No. 4. Plaintiff Gabriel Adam 20 Royall (“Royall” or “Plaintiff”) opposes. ECF No. 7. As set forth below, the Court grants 21 the motion. 22 I. BACKGROUND 23 On September 8, 2025, Plaintiff filed this lawsuit pro se in California Superior Court 24 for the County of San Diego. ECF No. 1-3 at 11–16 (“Compl.”). The Complaint asserts 25 claims for (1) intentional infliction of emotional distress, (2) negligence, (3) abuse of 26 process, (4) violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, and (5) fraud. Id. at 15. He 27 seeks damages in the amount of $5,000,000. Id. at 16. 28 /// 1 On September 30, 2025, Defendant removed the action to this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.