Joel Garcia v. Warden, FCI Terminal Island
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOEL GARCIA,
NO. CV-25-08928-SRM (AGR)
12 Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
13
THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE
v. 14 DISMISSED
15 WARDEN, FCI TERMINAL ISLAND,
16 Defendant.
17
18 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 19 by a Person in Federal Custody (“Petition”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Dkt. 20 No. 1)1 For the reasons set forth below, Petitioner is ordered to show cause, in 21 writing, on or before November 6, 2025, why the Court should not dismiss the 22 Petition for lack of jurisdiction. 23
24
25 26 27 1 Page citations are to the page numbers assigned by the CM/ECF in the 28 header of the document. 1 I. 2 PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 3 The court takes judicial notice of Petitioner’s criminal case in United States 4 v. Joel Garcia, SA-11-CR-873 XR (W.D. Tex.). Fed. R. Evid. 201. 5 On January 8, 2013, the Court in the Western District of Texas accepted Petitioner’s guilty plea. …