Joel Garcia v. Warden, FCI Terminal Island

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20252:25-cv-08928California1,523 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOEL GARCIA,

NO. CV-25-08928-SRM (AGR)

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

13

THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

v. 14 DISMISSED

15 WARDEN, FCI TERMINAL ISLAND,

16 Defendant.

17

18 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 19 by a Person in Federal Custody (“Petition”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Dkt. 20 No. 1)1 For the reasons set forth below, Petitioner is ordered to show cause, in 21 writing, on or before November 6, 2025, why the Court should not dismiss the 22 Petition for lack of jurisdiction. 23

24

25 26 27 1 Page citations are to the page numbers assigned by the CM/ECF in the 28 header of the document. 1 I. 2 PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 3 The court takes judicial notice of Petitioner’s criminal case in United States 4 v. Joel Garcia, SA-11-CR-873 XR (W.D. Tex.). Fed. R. Evid. 201. 5 On January 8, 2013, the Court in the Western District of Texas accepted Petitioner’s guilty plea. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.