Trate

Kareem Al-Jaml Young v. B. M. Trate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20251:23-cv-00055California424 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KAREEM AL-JAML YOUNG,

12 Petitioner, No. 1:23-cv-00055-TLN-CDB

13 14 v. ORDER

B. M. TRATE,

15 Respondent. 16

17 18 Petitioner Kareem Al-Jaml Young (“Petitioner”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se 19 and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 20 This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 21 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(c)(17). 22 On June 16, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations 23 that the petition be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (ECF No. 20.) On June 20, 2025, 24 Petitioner filed a notice of change of address and the findings and recommendations were re- 25 served on Petitioner at his new address that same date. (ECF No. 21.) The findings and 26 recommendations contained notice that any objections were to be filed within twenty-one days 27 after being served. (ECF No. 20.) This deadline has now passed, and no objections were filed.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.