Monroe
Randy Joe Rocha v. Atlee M. Monroe, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RANDY JOE ROCHA, No. 1:24-cv-00446 KES GSA (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR LATE FILING
13 v. (ECF No. 4) 14 ATLEE M. MONROE, et al.,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
15 Defendants. FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 16 (ECF No. 3) 17 ORDER ACKNOWLEDGING PLAINTIFF’S
NOTICE TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE
18 (ECF No. 11) 19
20 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil 21 rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 22 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 23 Before this Court are Plaintiff’s motion for late filing (ECF No. 4); his motion for the 24 appointment of counsel (ECF No. 3), and a “notice” which requests that he be able to proceed 25 with this case (see ECF No. 11). For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff’s motion for late filing 26 will be…