Brent Lee Harding v. Correctional Health Services, et al.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRENT LEE HARDING, No. 2:21-cv-00922 KJM SCR P 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee during the events underlying his federal claims, filed this civil 19 rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He is proceeding pro se. The matter was 20 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 21 302. 22 On August 13, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 23 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 24 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 60. Neither party 25 has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 26 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 27 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 28 de novo. See Robbins…