Covello

Alexander Lopez v. Patrick Covello

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20252:22-cv-01032California5,838 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALEXANDER LOPEZ, No. 2:22-CV-1032-DJC-DMC-P 12 Petitioner,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

13 v. 14 PATRICK COVELLO, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of 18 habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court are Petitioner’s petition for a 19 writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, and Respondent’s answer, ECF No. 10. Petitioner did not file 20 a traverse. Respondent has lodged the state court record, ECF No. 9. 21 Because this action was filed after April 26, 1996, the provisions of the 22 Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”) are presumptively applicable. 23 See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. 320, 336 (1997); Calderon v. United States Dist. Ct. (Beeler), 128 24 F.3d 1283, 1287 (9th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1099 (1998). Under AEDPA, federal 25 habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) is not available for any claim decided on the merits in 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.