Martinez

Raymond Thompkins v. Luis Martinez, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20252:23-cv-00449California677 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAYMOND THOMPKINS,

12 Petitioner, No. 2:23-cv-00449-TLN-CKD

13 14 v. ORDER LUIS MARTINEZ, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 17 18 This matter is before the Court on pro se Petitioner Raymond Thompkins’s 19 (“Petitioner”) Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s June 18, 2025 Order. (ECF No. 24.) No 20 opposition has been filed. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Petitioner’s 21 motion. 22 On May 14, 2025, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, 23 recommending Petitioner’s application for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1) be denied. (ECF 24 No. 21.) Petitioner did not file objections to the findings and recommendations. On June 18, 25 2025, this Court adopted the findings and recommendations in full and closed the case. (ECF No. 26 22.) On the same day, the Clerk of the Court entered Judgment. (ECF No. 23.) Petitioner now 27 seeks reconsideration of the Court’s June 18, 2025 Order. (ECF No. 24.) 28 1 The Court may grant reconsideration…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.