JENNETTE LYNN STANCY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20252:23-cv-00604California378 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JENNETTE LYNN STANCY, 12 Plaintiff, No. 2:23-cv-00604-TLN-DMC 13 v. 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ORDER

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Jennette Lynn Stancy (“Plaintiff”), who is proceeding with retained counsel, 18 brought this action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security 19 under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant 20 to Eastern District of California local rules. 21 On June 11, 2025, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations which were 22 served on the parties, and which contained notice that objections could be filed within fourteen 23 (14) days. This deadline has passed, and no objections have been filed. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.