Geerts

Michael D. Geerts dba MD Geerts v. Security National Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20252:24-cv-02514California2,553 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL D. GEERTS DBA MD

GEERTS,

12 No. 2:24-cv-02514-TLN-AC Plaintiff, 13

14 ORDER v. 15

SECURITY NATIONAL INSURANCE

16 COMPANY, 17 Defendant. 18 19 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Security National Insurance Company’s 20 (“Defendant”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff Michael D. Geerts 21 filed an opposition. (ECF No. 10.) Defendant filed a reply. (ECF No. 12.) For the reasons set 22 forth below, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 2 This case arises from an insurance dispute. Plaintiff, an excavation contractor, was sued 3 in the matter of Burke v. Realty Center Management Inc., et al., in Placer County Superior Court 4 (“the Liability Action”). (ECF No. 9 at 6; ECF No. 1-1 at 14.) In the Liability Action, the 5 electrical subcontractor, Jared Burke (“Burke”), alleged he was injured on August 10, 2020, due 6 to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.