Ninfa Flores, et al. v. County of Los Angeles, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 NINFA FLORES, et al. Case No. 2:25-cv-03072-FLA 12 Plaintiffs, (SSCx) [Consolidated with Case 13 v. No. 2:25-cv-06943-FLA (SSCx)]
14 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 15 Defendant(s). ORDER1 16
17 1. INTRODUCTION 18 1.1 Purposes and Limitations. Discovery in this action is likely to 19 involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for 20 which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any 21 purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 22 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to 23 24 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties 25
26 1 This Stipulated Protective Order is substantially based on the model 27 protective order provided under Magistrate Judge Stephanie S. 1 acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all 2 disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords 3 from public disclosure and use extends…