Emoni Wilson v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., et al.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 EMONI WILSON, No. 2:25-cv-00672-TLN-CKD 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER 13 EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., et al, 14 Defendants. 15

16 17 Plaintiff Emoni Wilson (“Plaintiff”) proceeds in this action pro se. This matter was 18 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 19 302. On August 06, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 4), 20 which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 21 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 4.) No objections were 22 filed and the time to do so has passed. 23 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 24 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 25 Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007). This Court has reviewed the file and 26 finds the findings and…