Rosita M. Stewart and Verne M. Manuelito v. General Motors LLC and Does 1-10

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20252:25-cv-07153California3,825 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROSITA M. STEWART, an individual; Case No. 2:25-cv-07153-SPG-MAA 11 and VERNE M. MANUELITO, an ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ 12 individual, MOTION TO REMAND 13 Plaintiffs, [ECF NO. 12]

14 v.

15 GENERAL MOTORS LLC, a Delaware 16 limited liability company; and DOES 1-10, 17 inclusive, Defendants. 18 19 20 Before the Court is the Motion to Remand (ECF No. 12 (“Motion”)) filed by 21 Plaintiffs Rosita M. Stewart and Verne M. Manuelito (“Plaintiffs”). The Court has read 22 and considered the Motion and concluded that it is suitable for decision without oral 23 argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. Having considered the parties’ 24 submissions, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court DENIES the Motion. 25 I. BACKGROUND 26 On or about January 25, 2023, Plaintiffs purchased a 2023 Chevrolet Silverado 2500, 27 manufactured and sold by Defendant General Motors LLC (“Defendant”). (ECF No. 1-1 28 (“Complaint”) ¶¶ 6, 9). When Plaintiffs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.