UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES —- GENERAL

Case No. 2:25-cv-08954-CAS-KSx Date October 7, 2025 Title Kishore K. Tangirala v. Wendy Espinoza et al

Present: The Honorable CHRISTINA A. SNYDER Catherine Jeang Not Present N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SUBJECT

MATTER JURISDICTION

On July 28, 2025, plaintiff Kishore K. Tangirala (“plaintiff’) filed this unlawful detainer action against defendants Wendy Espinoza (“Espinoza’”’) and Does 1-10 (collectively, “defendants”) in Los Angeles County Superior Court. Dkt. 1 at 1. Espinoza removed the case to this Court on September 19, 2025. Id. Espinoza concurrently filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. 5. Espinoza asserts that this Court has jurisdiction on the basis of a federal question. Dkt. 1 at 2 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and § 1441). It appears that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this action. The law is clear that “[u|nlawful detainer actions are strictly within the province of state court.” Federal Nat’] Mort. Assoc. v. Suarez, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82300, *6 (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2011); Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co. v. Leonardo, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83854, *2 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2011) (“T]he complaint only asserts a claim for unlawful detainer, a cause of action that is purely a matter of state law.”). Here, the only claim asserted by plaintiff is for unlawful detainer against defendants. See dkt. 1 at 1-2. Accordingly, defendants are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, on or before October 21, 2025, why this case should not be remanded to Los Angeles County Superior Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

00 : 00 Initials of Preparer CMS