Sam Benford v. Legend Auto Works Inc. et al

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20252:25-cv-05795California253 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No.: 2:25-cv-05795-SVW-JPR Date: October 8, 2025

Title: Sam Benford v. Legend Auto Works Inc. et al

Present: The Honorable STEPHEN V. WILSON, United States District Judge

Daniel Tamayo N/A

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):

None Appearing None Appearing

Proceedings: [In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before October 17, 2025, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.