Ethan R. Smith v. Aston Martin Lagonda of North America, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ETHAN R SMITH, Case No. 2:25-cv-07838-SB-AJR Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
REMAND [DKT. NO. 18] AND
ASTON MARTIN LAGONDA OF DENYING REQUEST FOR
NORTH AMERICA, INC., ATTORNEY’S FEES
Defendant.
Defendant Aston Martin Lagonda of North America, Inc. removed this lemon law case, invoking diversity jurisdiction. Plaintiff Ethan Smith moves to remand. Dkt. No. 18. The Court finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument and vacates the October 17 motion hearing. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L.R. 7-15. The motion is granted. Federal courts are presumed to lack jurisdiction, and a removing defendant bears the burden of establishing that removal is proper. Lake v. Ohana Mil. Communities, LLC, 14 F.4th 993, 1000 (9th Cir. 2021). “Federal jurisdiction must be rejected if there is any doubt as to the right of removal in the first instance.” Gaus v. Miles, Inc., 980 F.2d 564, 566 (9th Cir. 1992). Defendant’s contention that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 depends on its assertion that Plaintiff’s actual damages are $33,128.67—the…