Daniel Brewer v. Aura Recinos et al

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20252:25-cv-08063California893 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:25-cv-08063-ODW (JCx) Date October 8, 2025 Title Daniel Brewer v. Aura Recinos et al

Present: The Honorable Otis D. Wright, II, United States District Judge Sheila English Not reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not present Not present Proceedings: In Chambers Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Daniel Brewer’s Motion to Remand, currently set for hearing on October 27, 2025. (Mot. Remand (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF No. 9.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 78(b) and Local Rule 7-15, the Court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument, VACATES the hearing, and GRANTS the Motion. Federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction only as authorized by the Constitution and Congress. U.S. Const. art. III, § 2, cl. 1; see also Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994). A suit filed in state court may be removed to federal court only if the federal court would have had original…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.