Purnell
Georgette G. Purnell v. RT Mora #772
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GEORGETTE G. PURNELL, Case No. 1:19-cv-00210-KES-BAM 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION
13 v. FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE
PLEADINGS, MOTION FOR SANCTIONS,
14 RT MORA #772, AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
15 Defendant. (Docs. 26, 29, 36) 16
FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE
17 18 Plaintiff Georgette G. Purnell (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, 19 initiated this civil action on February 13, 2019. (Doc. 1.) On September 20, 2021, Defendant R. 20 T. Mora (“Defendant” or “Defendant Mora”) filed a motion for partial judgment on the 21 pleadings.1 (Doc. 26.) That same day, Defendant also requested that the Court issue an order for 22 the redacted copy Defendant’s body worn camera (“BWC”) video to be filed under seal (Doc. 23 33), and filed a motion for sanctions against Plaintiff seeking $2,520 for attorney’s fees. (Doc. 24 29.) On April 20, 2022, Defendant filed an additional motion, a…