Warden

Victor Molinero Puente v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20251:23-cv-00083California950 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3

4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 VICTOR MOLINERO PUENTE, Case No. 1:23-cv-00083-CDB (HC)

12 Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE

13 v. IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO OBEY COURT

ORDERS

14 WARDEN, (Docs. 15, 17) 15 Respondent. 16 5-DAY DEADLINE 17 18 Petitioner Victor Molinero Puente (“Petitioner”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in 19 forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. 1). 20 On August 21, 2025, Respondent filed a request for a brief extension of time to file a response 21 to the petition considering counsel’s anticipated receipt of documents from the U.S. Bureau of Prisons 22 necessary for preparing the response. (Doc. 15). The Court granted Respondent’s request on August 23 22, 2025, extending to September 9, 2025, the deadline for Respondent to respond to the petition. (Doc. 24 17). 25 The deadline to file a response has passed and Respondent has failed to file…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.