Valladolid

Mujaahid Harris v. Valladolid, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20251:23-cv-01502California1,981 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5

6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

9 MUJAAHID HARRIS, 1:23-cv-01502-JLT-EPG (PC) 10 11 Plaintiff, F R I E N C D O IN M G M S E A N N D D IN R G E T C H O A M T M P E L N A D IN A T T I I F O F N ’S S 12 v. M IN O JU T N IO C N T I F O O N R A P N R D EL A IM T I E N M A P R O Y R ARY 13 VALLADOLID, et al., R ESTRAINING ORDER BE DENIED (ECF No. 42) 14 Defendants.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

15 THIRTY (30) DAYS

16

17 Plaintiff Mujaahid F. Harris (Plaintiff) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 18 this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed his initial complaint on 19 October 23, 2023, and he filed a first amended complaint on February 2, 2024. (ECF Nos. 1 20 and 8). This case proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against 21 Defendants Valladolid, Ramirez, Forbes, and Patrick and Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment failure 22 to protect claim against Defendants Butler and Osmer related to an incident that took place on 23…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.