Gibralter, LLC, et al. v. DMS Flowers, LLC, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GIBRALTER, LLC, et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-00174-CDB
12 Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING
WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE
13 v. IMPOSED OR OTHER DISCIPLINARY 14 ACTION SHOULD NOT ISSUE AGAINST DMS FLOWERS, LLC, et al., COUNSEL LAURIE DOUCE NORMANDIN 15 Defendants. (Doc. 115) 16
7-DAY DEADLINE 17
18 Relevant Background 19 On June 9, 2025, Defendant Teleflora, LLC (“Teleflora”) filed a motion to dismiss the first 20 amended complaint (“FAC”) of Plaintiffs Gibralter, LLC (“Gibralter”), and Divinely, Inc. 21 (“Divinely”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”). (Doc. 111). On June 23, 2025, Plaintiffs filed an 22 opposition to the motion to dismiss. (Doc. 115). On July 3, 2025, Teleflora filed a reply. (Doc. 23 121). Following review of the parties’ filings made in connection with the motion, the Court 24 deemed the motion is suitable for disposition without hearing and oral argument. (Doc. 122) (citing 25 Local Rule 230(g)).…