Doer

Maxsony Coissy v. Doer, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20251:24-cv-01556California6,588 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

I. Background

18 Plaintiff Maxsony Coissy (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. 20 Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) and pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. 21 §§ 2401 et seq. 22 On July 18, 2025, the Court screened the complaint and granted Plaintiff leave to file a 23 first amended complaint or notice of voluntary dismissal within thirty days. (ECF No. 13.) 24 Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with the Court’s order would result in a 25 recommendation for dismissal of this action, with prejudice, for failure to obey a court order and 26 failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Id. at 16.) The screening order was 27 served on Plaintiff at his current address of record at Atwater U.S. Penitentiary in Atwater, 28 1 California. On August 4, 2025, the Court’s order was returned as “Undeliverable, Return to 2 Sender, Refused.” 3 The deadline for Plaintiff to respond to this Court’s order has now expired, and Plaintiff 4 has not filed a notice of change of address or otherwise communicated with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.