Castonguay
Roberty Drawn, IV v. Ronald Castonguay, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERTY DRAWN, IV, No. 1:25-cv-00722-JLT-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION
13 v. FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
14 RONALD CASTONGUAY, et al., (ECF No. 11) 15 Defendants.
16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed August 18, 2025. 20 I. 21 SCREENING REQUIREMENT 22 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 23 governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The 24 Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally 25 “frivolous or malicious,” that “fail[] to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or that “seek[] 26 …