Taiarol

1 2 3

4 5

6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEVEN R. RODRIGUEZ, No. 2:21-cv-1958 SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 RYAN TAIAROL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights 18 action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s third amended complaint (“TAC”) is before the 19 undersigned for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The TAC states a cognizable Fourteenth 20 Amendment falsification of evidence claim against defendants Taiarol, Mamaril, Abdallah, and 21 Paris, but no other cognizable claims. Plaintiff was previously advised that the TAC was his final 22 chance to amend his claim challenging the issuance of search warrants. Further, the remaining 23 claims fail to comply with Rule 8 despite repeated warnings. Therefore, the undersigned 24 recommends the TAC’s remaining claims and defendants be dismissed without prejudice. 25 STATUTORY SCREENING OF PRISONER COMPLAINTS 26 The…