MINDTICKLE, INC. v. Knkhlaanw

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20252:25-cv-02210California4,385 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 Mmoohhaammmmaadd@ Nm. Knkhlaanw, yEesrqs.. c(oSmB No. 297729) 2 Nishita Patel, Esq. (SB No. 189039) nishita@mnklawyers.com 3 Shakti J. Vadgama, Esq. (SB No. 304034) 4 shakti@mnklawyers.com

MNK LAW, APC

5 18000 Studebaker Rd., Suite 305 6 Cerritos, California 90703 Tel.: (562) 362-6437 7 Fax: (562) 362-6605 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff 9

MINDTICKLE, INC.

10

11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

14 Case No. 2:25-cv- 02210-FMO-SKx 15 MINDTICKLE, INC., a Delaware

16 Corporation, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

ORDER

17 Plaintiff,

18 v.

19 Studio Enterprise, LLC, a Delaware [Discovery Document: Referred to 20 Limited Liability Company; South Magistrate Judge Steve Kim] University Savannah, LLC, a Georgia 21 Limited Liability Company; and DOES 22 1-10, inclusive,

23 Defendants. 24

25

26

27

28 1 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 3 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 4 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.