Jose Uribe Alama v. C.R. England, Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20255:25-cv-02547California1,559 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

JS-6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. ED CV 25-2547 PA (RAOx) Date October 8, 2025 Title Jose Uribe Alama v. C.R. England, Inc., et al.

Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Kamilla Sali-Suleyman Phyllis Preston Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Andranik Tsarukyan (video) Bruce Joehm (video) Proceedings: STATUS CONFERENCE via ZOOM

Court and counsel confer concerning the Notice of Removal (“NOR”) filed by defendant C.R. England, Inc. (“Defendant”). Defendant alleges that this Court possesses diversity jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. On October 8, 2025, the Court held a video conference hearing to determine whether diversity jurisdiction over this action exists. For the reasons stated below, the Court finds that Defendant has failed to plausibly allege that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action. Federal courts are courts of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.