King

King v. Villegas

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202523-1713California8,049 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. Background

On August 17, 2016, there was a physical altercation between King and two KVSP correctional officers, Defendants-Appellees R. Villegas and P. Cruz (collectively, “Defendants”). Because the facts of this incident are disputed, we present two versions of the events as alleged by the respective parties. We begin with King’s version of events. King alleges in his complaint that Villegas and an unidentified officer came to King’s housing unit to escort him and about nine other inmates to a different part of the prison. King and the other inmates were “‘immediately’ placed . . . in restraints (handcuffs) based upon [their] orientation status.” As exhibits to his complaint, King attached declarations from newly arrived inmates in KVSP, who had come to the prison at about the same time as King. All of them stated that newly

KING V. VILLEGAS 5

arrived inmates could not leave their cells without first being handcuffed. King alleges that Villegas and the other officer escorted King and the others to the mental health department building. An inmate directly behind King asked King a question, and he responded. Villegas then approached King and said, “What…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.