Yang

Yang v. Allstate Insurance Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202524-651California374 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BIN YANG, No. 24-651 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-03016-GW-PD v.

MEMORANDUM*

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 15, 2025**

Before: FRIEDLAND, MILLER, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Bin Yang appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in her

diversity action against Allstate alleging breach of contract and insurance bad faith.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Lowry v. City

of San Diego, 858 F.3d 1248, 1254 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc). We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court properly granted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.