Yang
Yang v. Allstate Insurance Company
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BIN YANG, No. 24-651 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-03016-GW-PD v.
MEMORANDUM*
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 15, 2025**
Before: FRIEDLAND, MILLER, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
Bin Yang appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in her
diversity action against Allstate alleging breach of contract and insurance bad faith.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Lowry v. City
of San Diego, 858 F.3d 1248, 1254 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc). We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court properly granted…