Ramirez

Ramirez v. Trusper Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202524-6434California1,133 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELIA RAMIREZ, individually and on No. 24-6434 behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 5:24-cv-02012-EJD Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. MEMORANDUM*

TRUSPER INC., doing business as Musely,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward J. Davila, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 7, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: NGUYEN and BRESS, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT, District Judge.**

Trusper Inc. (doing business as “Musely”) appeals the district court’s order

denying its motion to compel arbitration. We have jurisdiction under 9 U.S.C.

§ 16(a)(1). Reviewing the district court’s decision de novo “and any underlying

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.