Myrick

Myrick v. Sekerke CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 20, 2025D085464California1,231 words

Opinion

Opinion

Castillo, J.

Filed 10/20/25 Myrick v. Sekerke CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

JESSICA MYRICK, D085464

Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 24FDV04836N)

STANLEY SEKERKE,

Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Steven K. Berenson, Commissioner. Affirmed. Stanley Sekerke, in pro. per., for Appellant. No appearance for Respondent. Stanley Sekerke, a self-represented litigant, challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the domestic violence restraining order entered against him protecting his sister-in-law Jessica Myrick and her spouse. Resolving this matter by memorandum opinion (see generally People v. Garcia (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 847), we affirm. I. At the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.