Young

Young v. Solana Labs, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202524-6032California1,882 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

OCT 20 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARK YOUNG, Nos. 24-6032

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 5:22-cv-03912-NW v. Northern District of California, San Francisco SOLANA LABS, INC.; et al.,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Rita Lin, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 8, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, NGUYEN, and BRESS Circuit Judges.

Solana Labs, Inc. (“Solana”) appeals the district court’s denial of its motion

to compel arbitration. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 16(a)(1)(B) and

28 U.S.C. § 1291. “We review denial of a motion to compel arbitration de novo,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. and review findings of fact underlying the district court’s decision for clear error.”

Lim v. TForce Logistics LLC, 8 F.4th 992, 999 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.