McCalla

United States v. McCalla

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202524-5913California425 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-5913 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:06-cr-00384-DSF-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

GEOFFREY DAVID MCCALLA,

Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 15, 2025**

Before: FRIEDLAND, MILLER, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Geoffrey David McCalla appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 30-month sentence imposed upon revocation of his supervised

release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

McCalla contends the district court procedurally erred by (1) failing to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). explain the above-Guidelines sentence adequately; (2) failing to consider…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.