Laszloffy

Laszloffy v. Garcia

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202524-3934California482 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN LASZLOFFY, No. 24-3934 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:19-cv-01173-JAD-BNW v.

MEMORANDUM*

CINDY ZORAIDA GARCIA; LEON

SYMANSKI; MERCURY

INSURANCE; FRIAS HOLDING

COMPANY, doing business as ANLV Cab LLC; ANLV CAB LLC, doing business as ANLV Cab,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 15. 2025**

Before: FRIEDLAND, MILLER, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

John Laszloffy appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). his diversity action alleging various state law claims arising from an insurance

settlement. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.