Greiner
Greiner v. Tesla Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JAMES GREINER, No. 25-399 D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00305-JAG Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MEMORANDUM*
TESLA INC., “Tesla”; ELON MUSK, “Elon”,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington James A. Goeke, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**
Submitted October 15, 2025***
Before: FRIEDLAND, MILLER, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
James Greiner appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
his diversity action alleging state law claims in connection with an arbitration
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). proceeding. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a
dismissal for failure…