Greiner

Greiner v. Democratic National Committee

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202524-2948California326 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMES GREINER, No. 24-2948 D.C. No. 2:24-cv-00092-TOR Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL

COMMITTEE; REPUBLICAN

NATIONAL COMMITTEE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Thomas O. Rice, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 15, 2025**

Before: FRIEDLAND, MILLER, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

James Greiner appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his action alleging various federal claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). Meland v. Weber, 2 F.4th 838, 843 (9th

Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.