Cabrera-Pineda

Cabrera-Pineda v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202525-2241California459 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RHINA IRIS CABRERA-PINEDA; et al., No. 25-2241 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A208-543-103

A208-543-101

v.

A208-543-102

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 15, 2025**

Before: FRIEDLAND, MILLER, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Rhina Iris Cabrera-Pineda and her children, natives and citizens of El

Salvador, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)

order summarily dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ’s”)

decision denying their application for asylum and Cabrera-Pineda’s applications

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.