Klat
Susan V. Klat v. Michael M. Roddy, in his official capacity as the Chief Executive Administrative Officer for San Diego Superior Court Services; and Does 1–10, inclusive
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 SUSAN V. KLAT, Case No.: 3:25-cv-00065-WQH-MMP
13 Plaintiff,
ORDER
14 v. 15 MICHAEL M. RODDY, in his official capacity as the Chief Executive 16 Administrative Officer for San Diego 17 Superior Court Services; and DOES 1–10, inclusive, 18 Defendants. 19 20 HAYES, Judge: 21 The matter before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 4) filed by Defendant 22 Michael M. Roddy. 23 I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 24 On January 13, 2025, Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a Complaint against 25 Defendants Michael M. Roddy (“Defendant Roddy”) and Does 1–10 (“Doe Defendants”). 26 (ECF No. 1.) 27 On March 14, 2025, Defendant Roddy filed a Motion to Dismiss requesting that the 28 Court dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). 1 (ECF No. 4.) On April 3, 2025, Plaintiff filed an Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss. 2 (ECF No. 6.) On April 14, 2025, Defendant Roddy filed a Reply in support of the Motion 3 to Dismiss. (ECF No. 7.) 4 II. …